'User agent' is a great idea that has been weirdly perverted.
Nobody these days (even highly technical people) has a user agent. (Maybe @drwho does.)
A user agent is a piece of software controlled by the *user*, that performs the automatic tasks the *user* has instructed it to. It communicates with other user agents, automatically, on the user's behalf.
Today, the term 'user agent' means 'long, misleading browser-lineage-identification string'. It identifies one of ~3 corporations.
Imagine if we actually *had* user agents.
Like, imagine if our computers were doing things we wanted them to do, automatically, on the network. And, it was our computers doing these things, instead of a rental service like ifttt or google alerts that's selling info on the back end. Imagine if they stopped doing things when we told them to stop.
Imagine if non-technical users had this too.
@enkiv2 I remember I think it was the early 1990s, lots of talk about 'software agents'. They were sort of the buzzword term, the 'neural networks' of that decade.
I don't really understand even now what lab that hype came from, and why it went away?
@sydneyfalk @natecull @enkiv2 Wasn't it about that time when covering up Area 51 was failing so badly, and the Philadelphia Experiment survivors were going out of phase while drinking at their local bars, and the CIA had to implement MKULTRA to discredit generations of laterally involved people because there weren't enough convenient "acccident" scenarios to eliminate everyone?
Did we miss anything? Probably.
Mastodon for witches and those who
dabble in the occult.
Heavily moderated, not a free speech zone